<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the iPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/</link>
	<description>Music + Technology + Random Nonsense from the Music Industry by Ethan Kaplan, VP Product, Live Nation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-193347</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/#comment-193347</guid>
		<description>I think I am just as bitter at no camera then I am a multitasking; it is a toss up. I&#039;d be signed up on the waiting list if they had those things.

Locked to a single cell phone provider for data was a point (I despise AT&amp;T). You can&#039;t add software that isn&#039;t on the iTunes store without hacking it was a point. No USB ports was a point. 

Does this blog take html codes? I&#039;d like to use bullets! ;)

Ethan, at the end of the day a lot of us are asking the same question: why did Apple do the big dog and pony show for a device this is slightly more than a 10&quot; iPod Touch? A lot of people are already talking about rev. 2 and rev. 1 is 60 days away. My personal opinion: that isn&#039;t a good sign. That is people saying that the iPad is not what they were looking for/expecting. Not in the form that was showed yesterday.

I wish Apple would have spent their R&amp;D time making an iPhone for other carriers! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I am just as bitter at no camera then I am a multitasking; it is a toss up. I&#8217;d be signed up on the waiting list if they had those things.</p>
<p>Locked to a single cell phone provider for data was a point (I despise AT&amp;T). You can&#8217;t add software that isn&#8217;t on the iTunes store without hacking it was a point. No USB ports was a point. </p>
<p>Does this blog take html codes? I&#8217;d like to use bullets! <img src='http://www.blackrimglasses.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ethan, at the end of the day a lot of us are asking the same question: why did Apple do the big dog and pony show for a device this is slightly more than a 10&#8243; iPod Touch? A lot of people are already talking about rev. 2 and rev. 1 is 60 days away. My personal opinion: that isn&#8217;t a good sign. That is people saying that the iPad is not what they were looking for/expecting. Not in the form that was showed yesterday.</p>
<p>I wish Apple would have spent their R&amp;D time making an iPhone for other carriers! <img src='http://www.blackrimglasses.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-193346</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/#comment-193346</guid>
		<description>If multitasking is the crux of your argument, then its a pretty piss poor argument. Something that can (and will) be added in an OS update is different from something that can&#039;t exist period. All Cocoa Touch devices multitask intrinsically, just not publicly available (for very good reasons if you&#039;ve ever used an Android phone). I&#039;m anxious to see HOW Apple implements multitasking, and hopefully its done with the same elegance copy/paste was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If multitasking is the crux of your argument, then its a pretty piss poor argument. Something that can (and will) be added in an OS update is different from something that can&#8217;t exist period. All Cocoa Touch devices multitask intrinsically, just not publicly available (for very good reasons if you&#8217;ve ever used an Android phone). I&#8217;m anxious to see HOW Apple implements multitasking, and hopefully its done with the same elegance copy/paste was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-193345</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/#comment-193345</guid>
		<description>Also, there was a market for cell phones and iPods back when the iPhone was released. It was a merging of two products. One less thing for people to carry around.

The tablet market has started and failed a number of times already. I am not going to go out on a limb and say Apple will fail on the iPad, but I think the response won&#039;t be what was hoped for. People won&#039;t be lining up two days in advance to buy one. I am guessing it will do better than Apple TV, but that wasn&#039;t much of a success. A lot of the comments and reviews I have read today echo what I have said: Apple could have done better. Everyone expected Apple to do better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, there was a market for cell phones and iPods back when the iPhone was released. It was a merging of two products. One less thing for people to carry around.</p>
<p>The tablet market has started and failed a number of times already. I am not going to go out on a limb and say Apple will fail on the iPad, but I think the response won&#8217;t be what was hoped for. People won&#8217;t be lining up two days in advance to buy one. I am guessing it will do better than Apple TV, but that wasn&#8217;t much of a success. A lot of the comments and reviews I have read today echo what I have said: Apple could have done better. Everyone expected Apple to do better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-193344</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/#comment-193344</guid>
		<description>Of course it is a software issue. I never implied otherwise. Individuals who jailbreak the iPhone or Touch have multitasking. iPhone OS is built off of OSX which obviously multitasks a lot better than Windows ever did or ever will. My argrument is based on fact: it does not, in its current form, multitask (or have a camera or do much more than a 10&quot; iPod Touch). 

My argument is they could have launched with multitasking and more. It is like the movie companies who keep releasing a new version of the same DVD. First you get a standard version, then a deluxe version, then an ultimate version. 

Even when Apple launched the first version of the iPhone they offered more than most phones. What is Apple offering new here except the 10&quot; screen, iWork, and a leash to AT&amp;T?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it is a software issue. I never implied otherwise. Individuals who jailbreak the iPhone or Touch have multitasking. iPhone OS is built off of OSX which obviously multitasks a lot better than Windows ever did or ever will. My argrument is based on fact: it does not, in its current form, multitask (or have a camera or do much more than a 10&#8243; iPod Touch). </p>
<p>My argument is they could have launched with multitasking and more. It is like the movie companies who keep releasing a new version of the same DVD. First you get a standard version, then a deluxe version, then an ultimate version. </p>
<p>Even when Apple launched the first version of the iPhone they offered more than most phones. What is Apple offering new here except the 10&#8243; screen, iWork, and a leash to AT&amp;T?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-193343</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/#comment-193343</guid>
		<description>The arguments about multitasking are idiotic. its a software concern, not a hardware. I guarantee that iPhone OS 4 will have multitasking, and likely require a lot of recompiling of a lot of apps to take advantage of it.

You&#039;re loosing the forest through the trees here. If you just change a few points, your whole comment is indicative of all the criticism leveled at the iPhone in 2007 and we see how that turned out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The arguments about multitasking are idiotic. its a software concern, not a hardware. I guarantee that iPhone OS 4 will have multitasking, and likely require a lot of recompiling of a lot of apps to take advantage of it.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re loosing the forest through the trees here. If you just change a few points, your whole comment is indicative of all the criticism leveled at the iPhone in 2007 and we see how that turned out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-193342</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/#comment-193342</guid>
		<description>Let me give my take. A little background: I love Apple. I&#039;ve been a UNIX guy for over 20 years so a company (like Apple) that puts UNIX out in the mainstream and makes great consumer products with it I stand 100% behind. I own an iPod Touch and a Mac-Mini (and have owned other Macs as well). 

With that out of the way: the iPad rev1 is an epic fail. Since when does Apple cater to an older generation? Steve didn&#039;t mention that during his presentation and I do not think he has ever come out and said,&quot;We would like to have a product that your mom and dad would like to be able to use with their failing eyesite.&quot; Seniors are not the demographic that happens into Apple stores. Young and hip... or at least young at heart. No offense to any senior citizens is implied.

They &quot;waited&quot; until they had the perfect device? If you were going to release a 10&quot; iPod Touch you could have done that a few years ago, right? 

&quot;Industry analysts said we needed to price this item between $800-$1,000.&quot; I am paraphrashing somewhat, but I think that is what Steve said as he introduced a starting price of $499 (oh boy!). Analysts were expecting more than a 10&quot; iPod Touch. Multitasking and a camera were a must. Not just a nice to have; A MUST. 

Steve said netbooks were cramped and underpowered. Hey Steve, maybe so... but they are computers running an operating system. They multitask and run off the shelf products. If they run slow, fine, we expect that. The more tasks you run the slower it gets. I get it! That is my option though. Netbooks also have USB ports. I can add a printer, external drive, whatever. I can support flash on my netbook browser too so I don&#039;t get the broken flash box when browsing the web like you did. 

Steve: there are cell providers in the U.S.A. that are NOT named AT&amp;T. TMO, VZW, Sprint. People want choice. It is not always about who has the best service. Everyone has their preference and not everyone wants AT&amp;T as a provider. You could have offered at least TMO as an option over AT&amp;T. 

After the presentation I am guessing that Steve Ballmer turned off the screen, chuckled, and called his friends at HP and they had a good laugh together. &quot;Hey guys, did you see that? Wow. A 10&quot; iPod Touch with iWork. How is the Slate coming? It is a computer and not a 10&quot; Zune, right?&quot; I  think it is a safe bet that the Slate will multitask. 

Steve reached. He thinks he can drop an &#039;i&#039; in front of anything and people will eat it up. Apple stock is down $7.43 this morning. I think others are underwhelmed too. Instead of &#039;iPad&#039; they could call it: &#039;i&#039;VeSeenThis&#039;. Silly, I know, but so is releasing a 10&quot; iPod Touch. 

I bet sometime soon we will see Android based &quot;pads&quot; that will mutlitask.  We will also see a rehashing of the Droid commercials referencing the iPad (iDon&#039;t do this... iDon&#039;t do that...). Apple has set themselves up on this one. 

Okay, now that I have that off of my chest: I can&#039;t wait to see what they do with Rev2 of the iPad! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me give my take. A little background: I love Apple. I&#8217;ve been a UNIX guy for over 20 years so a company (like Apple) that puts UNIX out in the mainstream and makes great consumer products with it I stand 100% behind. I own an iPod Touch and a Mac-Mini (and have owned other Macs as well). </p>
<p>With that out of the way: the iPad rev1 is an epic fail. Since when does Apple cater to an older generation? Steve didn&#8217;t mention that during his presentation and I do not think he has ever come out and said,&#8221;We would like to have a product that your mom and dad would like to be able to use with their failing eyesite.&#8221; Seniors are not the demographic that happens into Apple stores. Young and hip&#8230; or at least young at heart. No offense to any senior citizens is implied.</p>
<p>They &#8220;waited&#8221; until they had the perfect device? If you were going to release a 10&#8243; iPod Touch you could have done that a few years ago, right? </p>
<p>&#8220;Industry analysts said we needed to price this item between $800-$1,000.&#8221; I am paraphrashing somewhat, but I think that is what Steve said as he introduced a starting price of $499 (oh boy!). Analysts were expecting more than a 10&#8243; iPod Touch. Multitasking and a camera were a must. Not just a nice to have; A MUST. </p>
<p>Steve said netbooks were cramped and underpowered. Hey Steve, maybe so&#8230; but they are computers running an operating system. They multitask and run off the shelf products. If they run slow, fine, we expect that. The more tasks you run the slower it gets. I get it! That is my option though. Netbooks also have USB ports. I can add a printer, external drive, whatever. I can support flash on my netbook browser too so I don&#8217;t get the broken flash box when browsing the web like you did. </p>
<p>Steve: there are cell providers in the U.S.A. that are NOT named AT&amp;T. TMO, VZW, Sprint. People want choice. It is not always about who has the best service. Everyone has their preference and not everyone wants AT&amp;T as a provider. You could have offered at least TMO as an option over AT&amp;T. </p>
<p>After the presentation I am guessing that Steve Ballmer turned off the screen, chuckled, and called his friends at HP and they had a good laugh together. &#8220;Hey guys, did you see that? Wow. A 10&#8243; iPod Touch with iWork. How is the Slate coming? It is a computer and not a 10&#8243; Zune, right?&#8221; I  think it is a safe bet that the Slate will multitask. </p>
<p>Steve reached. He thinks he can drop an &#8216;i&#8217; in front of anything and people will eat it up. Apple stock is down $7.43 this morning. I think others are underwhelmed too. Instead of &#8216;iPad&#8217; they could call it: &#8216;i&#8217;VeSeenThis&#8217;. Silly, I know, but so is releasing a 10&#8243; iPod Touch. </p>
<p>I bet sometime soon we will see Android based &#8220;pads&#8221; that will mutlitask.  We will also see a rehashing of the Droid commercials referencing the iPad (iDon&#8217;t do this&#8230; iDon&#8217;t do that&#8230;). Apple has set themselves up on this one. </p>
<p>Okay, now that I have that off of my chest: I can&#8217;t wait to see what they do with Rev2 of the iPad! <img src='http://www.blackrimglasses.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Stratford</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-193341</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Stratford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/#comment-193341</guid>
		<description>Nice writeup, I think expectations began to point to some new 360 degree shift, but apple consciously went with the &quot;lets expand the iPhone ecosystem approach&quot; here and tap into iPhone&#039;s success at being something different for everyone. Personally, I think a 10&quot; multi touch screen with the responsiveness of the iPhone&#039;s will be very compelling. I may be getting old, as i probably will wait for the second go around before there is one next to my couch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice writeup, I think expectations began to point to some new 360 degree shift, but apple consciously went with the &#8220;lets expand the iPhone ecosystem approach&#8221; here and tap into iPhone&#8217;s success at being something different for everyone. Personally, I think a 10&#8243; multi touch screen with the responsiveness of the iPhone&#8217;s will be very compelling. I may be getting old, as i probably will wait for the second go around before there is one next to my couch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avram</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-193340</link>
		<dc:creator>avram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/#comment-193340</guid>
		<description>camera would have been nice, as we can skype with this device, I wonder since it has a camera dowload port if you could hook a miniature camera to it. Yet, in my portable pc at work I do not have a camera, so it won;t hamper me. 
I would be so much more productive using the ipad than my pc, if only I can convince my work to support it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>camera would have been nice, as we can skype with this device, I wonder since it has a camera dowload port if you could hook a miniature camera to it. Yet, in my portable pc at work I do not have a camera, so it won;t hamper me.<br />
I would be so much more productive using the ipad than my pc, if only I can convince my work to support it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-193339</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2010/01/27/thoughts-on-the-ipad/#comment-193339</guid>
		<description>Apple&#039;s Win, Wrapped In A Miss, Rolled In Confusion

http://j.mp/fight_iPad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s Win, Wrapped In A Miss, Rolled In Confusion</p>
<p><a href="http://j.mp/fight_iPad" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/fight_iPad</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

