<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don Dodge on The Next Big Thing: 50M Facebook users don&#8217;t care about OpenSocial APIs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2007/11/02/don-dodge-on-the-next-big-thing-50m-facebook-users-dont-care-about-opensocial-apis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2007/11/02/don-dodge-on-the-next-big-thing-50m-facebook-users-dont-care-about-opensocial-apis/</link>
	<description>Music + Technology + Random Nonsense from the Music Industry by Ethan Kaplan, VP Product, Live Nation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2007/11/02/don-dodge-on-the-next-big-thing-50m-facebook-users-dont-care-about-opensocial-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-189612</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2007/11/02/don-dodge-on-the-next-big-thing-50m-facebook-users-dont-care-about-opensocial-apis/#comment-189612</guid>
		<description>Then thats your friends. I though the &quot;Internet as the place for nerds&quot; thing broke long ago, at least in my experience.

I&#039;m all for Facebook, but I think a universal platform API (which Google may or may not provide) is only a good thing. A container which abstracts interfaces to different web apps, and to each other (key point) would rock much more than a single platform would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then thats your friends. I though the &#8220;Internet as the place for nerds&#8221; thing broke long ago, at least in my experience.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for Facebook, but I think a universal platform API (which Google may or may not provide) is only a good thing. A container which abstracts interfaces to different web apps, and to each other (key point) would rock much more than a single platform would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Gregan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2007/11/02/don-dodge-on-the-next-big-thing-50m-facebook-users-dont-care-about-opensocial-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-189611</link>
		<dc:creator>George Gregan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2007/11/02/don-dodge-on-the-next-big-thing-50m-facebook-users-dont-care-about-opensocial-apis/#comment-189611</guid>
		<description>In my experience, facebook has  attracted all my &quot;non-geeky&quot; friends to &quot;network socially&quot; via the web. 

Prior to facebook, most of them thought using the internet was the province of nerds. Given the network effect &amp; stickiness of facebook, I can&#039;t see my non-geeky friends (ie normal people) switching en-mass to another site just because its &quot;open&quot;. There needs to be another killer feature (which can&#039;t be replicated in facebook)

Your AOL example is flawed - there was another killer feature - all the websites outside of AOL...


I have yet to see how open social will cater properly for privacy. This is one area that facebook got right and made my non-ggeky friends feel comfortable. Of all my friends (including the geeky &amp; Muso&#039;s, non of them use their real names on myspace)

I totally agree Opensocial is a good thing, but don&#039;t hold your hopes for probably 40-45m of those facebook users switching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, facebook has  attracted all my &#8220;non-geeky&#8221; friends to &#8220;network socially&#8221; via the web. </p>
<p>Prior to facebook, most of them thought using the internet was the province of nerds. Given the network effect &amp; stickiness of facebook, I can&#8217;t see my non-geeky friends (ie normal people) switching en-mass to another site just because its &#8220;open&#8221;. There needs to be another killer feature (which can&#8217;t be replicated in facebook)</p>
<p>Your AOL example is flawed &#8211; there was another killer feature &#8211; all the websites outside of AOL&#8230;</p>
<p>I have yet to see how open social will cater properly for privacy. This is one area that facebook got right and made my non-ggeky friends feel comfortable. Of all my friends (including the geeky &amp; Muso&#8217;s, non of them use their real names on myspace)</p>
<p>I totally agree Opensocial is a good thing, but don&#8217;t hold your hopes for probably 40-45m of those facebook users switching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

