<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WBR </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2007/07/26/wbr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2007/07/26/wbr/</link>
	<description>Music + Technology + Random Nonsense from the Music Industry by Ethan Kaplan, VP Product, Live Nation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2007/07/26/wbr/comment-page-1/#comment-188228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 23:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2007/07/26/wbr/#comment-188228</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that, Ethan.

If nothing else, it tells me that I need to do some deeper research into Drupal before making a rash decision. Appreciate it!

--Mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that, Ethan.</p>
<p>If nothing else, it tells me that I need to do some deeper research into Drupal before making a rash decision. Appreciate it!</p>
<p>&#8211;Mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2007/07/26/wbr/comment-page-1/#comment-188220</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2007/07/26/wbr/#comment-188220</guid>
		<description>Drupal over Joomla is easy: its object based, and not as tied to a strict three tiered content organization scheme as Joomla. That means that it is not a CMS, but an application framework, which makes it much easier to abstract and adapt into any implementation scheme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drupal over Joomla is easy: its object based, and not as tied to a strict three tiered content organization scheme as Joomla. That means that it is not a CMS, but an application framework, which makes it much easier to abstract and adapt into any implementation scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey</title>
		<link>http://www.blackrimglasses.com/2007/07/26/wbr/comment-page-1/#comment-188219</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2007/07/26/wbr/#comment-188219</guid>
		<description>Hey Ethan,

I&#039;ve been reading your blog for some time now, and you&#039;ve got me interested in Drupal. I&#039;ve been using Joomla successfully for a while, and when I compare features I don&#039;t find much to make Drupal seem all that (comparatively) spectacular... but maybe there are music-site-specific modules etc that I&#039;m not seeing?

If you&#039;re familiar with Joomla, could you comment on one versus the other?

Much thanks,

--Mikey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ethan,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading your blog for some time now, and you&#8217;ve got me interested in Drupal. I&#8217;ve been using Joomla successfully for a while, and when I compare features I don&#8217;t find much to make Drupal seem all that (comparatively) spectacular&#8230; but maybe there are music-site-specific modules etc that I&#8217;m not seeing?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re familiar with Joomla, could you comment on one versus the other?</p>
<p>Much thanks,</p>
<p>&#8211;Mikey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

